We do not limit our vocabulary in terms of architectural styles be it modern minimalist, contemporary, industrial, or ornate classical. All components when put together in any style should have meaning. This meaning may be defined by purpose, personality of the user, or their lifestyle. It is this projected interpretation that gives meaning to our projects.
Our style is our process that is the reflection of our end-user – who could be a single person or an intellectual public group. To understand, interpret and reflect their personality is what embeds meaning to the built form. Our buildings do not contradict the personality of its user, unless we desire a contradiction. Hence, our emphasis is on the spatial arrangement/planning and the research to adopt any particular architectural style that can express the interpreted meaning to our built form.
The style is not a part of our process but the research that leads to it. Therefore, as an end-product, all our buildings are distinctly different from one another. This is the result of our process that understands the aesthetic required for a highly educated, non-flamboyant person as being very different from that of an elderly, cultivated person. But the building’s discectomy unveils the projected personality of its user, which is the common unifying factor.
