
So, just as cultures grow and can never stop evolving by the process of acculturation and forming sub cultures, would it be right to fixate on 'Indian-ness' that has never remained the same? In fact, our culture is constantly changing. We never realize how quickly we change as we fear for ourselves in terms of architectural vocabulary or anything that we once admired. With rising global culture, it is foolhardy to stick to what was once Indian. It is not anymore. Yet culture never disappears, it merely adapts, to survive. But our ambidextrous approach to be at times xenocentric or ethnocentric takes us towards cultural relativism. So, our approach towards architectural and planning practices cannot continue to focus on saving the past.
Indian is neither the glorious past nor the brilliant present - the role of culture and planning in development and growth of human settlements has been mutually exclusive

The current building materials and technology do not justify the current context and sustainability. Neither is holding on to the oriental mindset right nor is holding on to the half-baked, borrowed technologies and materials right. Innovation is needed for the mess that we have created globally. Instead of 'producing', we need to 'consume and reuse' what we have produced in abundance.
So, new materials would emerge out of wastes for the next two decades. The true Indian is sustainable - holistically. Even in architecture, if this Indianness is adapted at the core conception, it would lead to automatic innovations in all aspects like climate control, ventilation, carbon footprints, landscaping, etc. An Indian architect needs to search his/her roots and forget what the age-old and the so-called contemporary have to say.




