Vijaydeep Verma, Founder, Taelman Technologies (a channel partner of Inter-Tech Marconite®), shares his views on the importance of earthing in manufacturing plants to make them safe and productive, and why architects must incorporate earthing solutions at the plant's design phase itself

Vijay Deep Verma
Earthing is a matter of design and needs serious design considerations. Architects must question whether the earthing is adequate to ensure safety of life/assets/equipment in the facility premises

Vijaydeep Verma

Breakdowns in manufacturing plants lead to loss of production and optimum performance of the machineries. Factory/plant architects and designers must take a knowledgeable approach towards possible reasons of breakdowns, address the problems with the right solutions, and thereby ensure trouble-free production.

One of the major reasons for electrical breakdowns in manufacturing plants is the poor electrical earthing. Most business owners are flushing their money down the drain through poor earthing of their premises and don't even know it! Bad earthing / grounding is widely neglected, and there is little awareness amongst the technical staff in most of the plants and offices.

Shoddy earthing is the cause of short circuits, electrical sparking, fire, shock, shutdowns and damage to assets like UPS, inverters, servers, transformers, DG sets, assembly line machines, besides the reason for incurring high electricity bills. It's a fact that faulty earthing has been the cause for major fires in many industries/factories, resulting in loss of assets worth millions.

Earthing is a matter of design and needs serious design considerations. Architects must question whether the earthing is adequate to ensure safety of life/assets/equipment in the facility – be it a factory, office, school, hospital, mall, etc. Business leaders and factory/office owners should do a litmus test based on three basic questions to question if the earthing in the premises is taking a toll on the company‘s profits: In our experience, 90% of the answers are: 1. No 2. Yes 3. No. If the answers to the above 3 questions are same, then an early audit of earthing may be a wise decision.

Decisions for earthing are often based on typical thumb rules, which are not suitable for different conditions. Also, these thumb rules do not consider soil resistivity, required earth resistance, and length of electrodes. Rather, they consider the age-old practice of a 3-meter chemical/conventional electrode to be fitted in all the situations. But, there is a scientific 5-step process for proper earthing:

While most business leaders are keen to usher in the latest technology/machinery and safety equipment, lesser focus has been on replacing the old earthing practice of using a GI/Cu pipe/plate impaled 3 meters (or less) into the ground and sprinkled with salt and coal. Advanced technology can offer maintenance free, corrosion free, and defect free solutions for a longer time.

Earthing is a 5-step process
Step Description Remarks
1 Know the required resistance of the earth electrode as per the application CPWD recommendation: 
a. < 1 Ohm - Power stations 
b. < 2 Ohm - DG sets/other critical applications
c. < 5 Ohm - Solar/other applications/body earthing
2 Measure the soil resistivity test at the site where the earthing is to be done Is done in-situ. Most important step for designing the earthing solution
3 Design the earthing solution as per the test readings and required resistance values Follow the design recommendations
4 Install the electrodes Follow the correct practices
5 Test and integrate with system/application Check and ensure that the desired results are being met
Usually, steps 4 & 5 are adopted while ignoring steps 1, 2 & 3.

The Soil Resistivity test is dependent on Mother Earth and varies from place to place as per the soil and terrain, and has to be carried out in-situ i.e. at the location. Humidity also plays a part in traditional/chemical earthing, so, one solution cannot fit all locations. The author has measured soil resistivity up to a massive 4003 Ω _m in rocky terrain. The globally acceptable soil resistivity test is done by fall of Potential method (EB Curtz method) or the Wenner 4-point test. A lab test of soil sample does not give soil resistivity readings.

Marconite
Every location has to have an earthing solution customized specifically for the application as per the soil resistance measured. Once done, earthing technology to match the need of the system and application is selected. However, at most locations, a standard 3-meter conventional/chemical earthing electrode is installed, assuming it is sufficient for providing safety to humans and equipment. But most earthing electrodes do not have low enough resistance to allow the fault current to dissipate safely, as per the design requirement. Therefore, the fault current remains within the system, damaging the sensitive equipment, stalling the operations, and posing a danger to the workers.

It is alarming to note that the technical maintenance staff in most organizations ignore the tell-tale signs and refuse to attribute repeated failures and breakdowns such as overheating of machines/assembly lines, equipment burnouts/failures, shocks, high electricity bills etc. to inadequate earthing. It provides a reference for circuit conductors to stabilize their voltage to ground during normal operations.

Lack of awareness is the key reason for paying little heed to the importance of proper earthing.

While buildings are built to last for 25 to 50 years, their earthing is planned for only 5 to 7 years, which actually lasts only for 2 to 3 years, and gives way to corrosion, leaching, damage, maintenance neglect, etc.

Benefits of proper earthing Adequate earthing based on 4th generation technology has 50+ years life cycle and costs a negligible less than 1% of the project cost. A good earthing technology like Marconite® from UK - an ultra-low resistance conductive concrete aggregate - aids in electrical noise reduction and minimizes the following: In India, this earthing technology is much appreciated for the results and higher performance of the plants, offices and other commercial buildings. It has made plants more productive and efficient. There is no revenue loss on account of non-productive hours. There is no repetitive breakdown effect on the lifecycle of machines.